CitizenLab's Blog
  • Platform
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Guides
  • About
  • Contact
  • Schedule a demo
  • English
    • Français
    • Nederlands
    • Español
  • Home
  • >
  • 🏛️ Blog
  • >
  • The ladder of citizen participation and community engagement

The ladder of citizen participation and community engagement

By Ilona Lodewijckx Civic Engagement 12/08/2021
CitizenLab's Blog
  • Platform
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Guides
  • About
  • Contact
  • Schedule a demo
  • English
    • Français
    • Nederlands
    • Español

In recent years, communities across the globe have voiced a burgeoning need and desire to be directly involved in local decision-making. 

As a result, community engagement has become an increasingly crucial topic for local governments. Not just because it plays into the inherent collaborative sentiment of a democratic system, but because it has proven to help administrations define community priorities, make more accurate decisions, and increase buy-in.

But where does one start? When it comes to engaging your community, there are a string of questions to consider and methods to choose from. The very first thing you’ll have to decide on is the ultimate goal of your project. Are you looking to notify your community about a specific decision or an upcoming renovation? Do you need feedback on a predetermined plan? Are you asking for community ideas or opinions? Or are you setting up an actual co-creation process? As a local government, you get to decide the extent to which community engagement results weigh on the final decision. Or, in other terms, where your project lands on the ladder of citizen participation, as developed by Sherry Arnstein in 1969.

Ladder of community participation
* This version of the ladder has been altered to reflect local governments’ unique perspective on community engagement in today’s world. You can view Arnstein’s original version of the participation ladder here.

The higher a project lands on the ladder, the more of a commitment or investment it’ll require on your end. On the other hand, it’s essential to remember that higher engagement levels are directly proportional to the degree of trust communities have for their representatives. The more decision-making power you decide to transfer to your communities, the more those same communities will consider your administration legitimately able to make decisions in the name of the common good.

The different levels of the participation ladder

1. Information: a democratic requirement

At the lowest rung of the ladder, we find up-to-date, transparent, and relevant information, which any elected representative naturally owes its constituents. The local administration commits to notifying the community and offering accessible argumentation about forthcoming or implemented decisions or policies through the local press, posters, social media, or updates on the city website.

While the importance of accessible and transparent information cannot be understated, merely stating the facts makes for an undirectional flow of communication that leaves community members unable to negotiate or share their feedback. Local governments have to move beyond this first rung to establish a sense of trust and reap the long-term benefits of community engagement.

The municipality of Rueil-Malmaison (??) used its online participation platform as a central hub to inform the community about business and isolation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the country was in lockdown, this turned out to be a smart way to make vital information easily accessibe to community members—and keep the community connected.

2. Consultation: gauging opinions

A project that makes it to the consultation phase asks the community for feedback, ideas, or opinions on specific topics, decisions, or plans. This usually happens through idea-collection, surveys, offline neighborhood meetings, public hearings, or focus groups.

Consultation can be a surefire way to engage your community and increase buy-in for decision-making—on one crucial condition. It has to lead to actionable to-dos and policy changes. The reason why consultation ranks low on the engagement ladder is that it can be hard to measure to which extent the community input will be taken into account. Suppose the collected input doesn’t genuinely have the power to influence the administration’s course of action. In that case, it serves as little but a smokescreen for making predefined decisions and can hardly be considered engagement at all. When organizing a consultation project, it’s therefore extra important to close the feedback loop and communicate results back to your community.

To shape their priorities for local communities, UNICEF launched a large-scale survey to gauge the issues that matter most to girls between 14 and 18 in Latin-American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. Over 1,400 girls participated. Their input will be used to inform UNICEF’s forthcoming decisions at a regional, national, and institutional level.

3. Involvement: a two-way street

In the involvement rung, community members have a more notable impact on local decision-making. The government actively makes an effort to engage the community through (online) workshops, focus groups, advisory committees, or participatory budgets. Involvement progresses beyond merely gauging opinions—it establishes a two-directional flow of communication and stimulates interaction. 

So, what’s the caveat? Well, at this level, the full authority still lies with the government. While the administration may actively engage its community and genuinely consider the given input, the final decision is theirs to make.

Lancaster, PA (??) involved its communities in a difficult conversation on public safety and policing. They organized listening sessions on the recruitment of the City’s next Chief of Police, making sure the community could weigh in on the hiring process. On top of that, they also established a Community and Police Working group with the power to deliberate on issues such as the use of force, civilian complaint forms, and body cameras.

4. Co-creation: working together as equals

In the fourth rung of the engagement ladder , decision-making power is shared (almost) equally between the local administration and the public. Community members and elected representatives work together to find feasible solutions, draft action plans, and implement projects. This is often done through joint policy boards or community groups.

In London (??), the borough of Newham has launched a 12-month cycle of community assemblies on a range of local challenges. 360,000 community members were given the opportunity to help set priorities, draft a shared vision for the neighborhood, and directly influence local decision-making. Over 500 community members have signed up to co-create their neighborhood.

5. Empowerment: communities push the needle forward

The highest level of community engagement occurs when the final responsibility for decision-making lies with communities rather than governments. In this scenario, community members have a veto right, which means the administration must take the community’s priorities into account. This degree of community engagement is rarely reached in practice, as it requires significant resources and a sense of total trust. 

While it might not be a pure example of this fifth rung, Stirling, Scotland (??) comes pretty close. By including petitions as an engagement option, the local community can share ideas and proposals which follow a clear roadmap of consideration and (potential) approval. So far, two community-led ideas have been placed on the council’s agenda.


Community engagement can be implemented at various levels, and with several aims and outcomes. While the 5 rungs of the ladder each have their own purposes and strengths, they also each have their own nuances and complexities. To combine feasible organization with the long-term benefits of involvement and co-creation, it pays not to stick to just one level of engagement.

Ready to engage your community?



citizen participationcivic engagementE-participationladder of participationonline engagement

You May Also Like

myths community engagement debunked
Civic Engagement 13/03/2023
5 most common myths about community engagement
CitizenLab's Inspiring Platforms
Civic Engagement 13/03/2023
Community engagement examples: February’s inspiring platforms
Civic Engagement 12/03/2023
5 ways online engagement leads to better data-driven decision-making in local government
Civic Engagement 10/03/2023
5 ways online engagement leads to better data-driven decision-making in local government
Inspiring platforms
Civic Engagement 28/02/2023
Community engagement examples: January’s inspiring platforms
Written By
Ilona Lodewijckx

She/her. Digital Content Creator at CitizenLab. Copywriter. Em dash (—) enthusiast.

Solutions
  • All solutions
  • Strategy & Budgeting
  • Planning & Public Spaces
  • Environment & Sustainability
  • Mobility & Infrastructure
  • Neighborhoods & Community Development
Platform
  • Platform features
  • Services
  • Plans
  • Schedule a demo
Academy
  • Resources
  • Blog
Company
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Partners
Get in touch
  • +44 79 2676 4670
  • +1 530 270 3403
  • Contact form
© 2022 CitizenLab: Community Engagement Platform. All rights reserved.
By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent1 yearRecords the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
geot_rocket_citysessionNo description available.
geot_rocket_countrysessionNo description available.
geot_rocket_statesessionNo description available.
PHPSESSIDsessionThis cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.
STYXKEY_geot_countrysessionNo description
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
CookieDurationDescription
bcookie2 yearsLinkedIn sets this cookie from LinkedIn share buttons and ad tags to recognize browser ID.
langsessionLinkedIn sets this cookie to remember a user's language setting.
lidc1 dayLinkedIn sets the lidc cookie to facilitate data center selection.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_gat_gtag_UA_65562281_11 minuteSet by Google to distinguish users.
_gcl_au3 monthsProvided by Google Tag Manager to experiment advertisement efficiency of websites using their services.
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
undefinedneverWistia sets this cookie to collect data on visitor interaction with the website's video-content, to make the website's video-content more relevant for the visitor.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to display advertisements when either on Facebook or on a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising, after visiting the website.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysA cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt.innertube::nextIdneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requestsneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
intercom-id-p4lr69wg8 months 26 days 1 hourNo description
intercom-session-p4lr69wg7 daysNo description
loglevelneverNo description available.
trx_addons_is_retina1 yearThis cookie is used for checking if the user has a retina display.
wp-wpml_current_languagesessionNo description available.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
CookieDurationDescription
AMP_TOKEN1 hourThis cookie is set by Google Analytics and contains a token that can be used to retrieve a Client ID from AMP Client ID service. Other possible values indicate opt-out, inflight request or an error retrieving a Client ID from AMP Client ID service.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo