CitizenLab's Blog
  • Platform
  • Clients
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Schedule a demo
  • English

Our 5 take-aways from #govtech talks at Impact2019

Coline Cuau By Coline Cuau Civic Engagement 23/05/2019
Case Study, Civic Engagement
Case study: +4,450 inhabitants contribute to regeneration projects in Leiden
Sören FilletBy Sören Fillet08/01/2021
Case Study, Civic Engagement, Participatory Budgeting
Participatory Budgeting in 3 Case Studies
Simon PastorBy Simon Pastor24/12/2020
Case Study, Civic Engagement
Case study: collective urban planning in the London Borough of Newham
Simon PastorBy Simon Pastor16/12/2020
CitizenLab's Blog
  • Platform
  • Clients
  • About
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Schedule a demo
  • English
Picture of stairs at the conference

Did you make it to the Impact conference? This annual event is about innovation and digital economy, with conversations about the future of health, finance, education, space… and of course governments.

CitizenLab headed to Krakow to talk about innovation in the #civictech and #govtech sectors, and we had some very interesting conversations about citizen participation and e-democracy along the way. Here are our top 5 govtech take-aways!

1. In governments, change has to come from within

This first point came from Robyn Scott (co-founder and CEO, Apolitical) and Katy McNeil (head of Intrapreneurial Leadership Programme, Civtech Scotland). Shiny technology and smart tools aren’t enough: if you want to change governments, you have to start by changing mentalities. Governments are understandably risk-averse, and this is standing in the way of change. In order to adopt a more innovative mindset, they need to accept failure and learn how to take risks.

There is also a clear need for more training and more support in order to help civil servants address the new challenges that they face. According to a recent Apolitical study, 42% of civil servants consider that they have insufficient or inadequate training resources. The solution? Training, training and more training. Dr Ayesha Khanna shared how the government of Singapore offers financial aids to government employees and interested citizens who wanted to learn how to code.

2. Find the bright spots

It’s not all grim and sad, pointed out Robyn Scott: some areas and teams within governments are being fantastically innovative. Governments should learn to celebrate these successes, and give these teams more space to innovate, try things and fail.

Shining a light on these bright spots and showing that innovation is within reach will help change the general mindset, and emulate other teams. Linking back to our first point, Scott pointed out that it’s also important to be transparent about the failures that happened along the way.

3. Re-think procurements

Heavy procurement systems are preventing start-ups from helping governments innovate. Moreover, as Katy McNeil pointed out, how can governments procure for something they don’t even know exists?

Justyna Orlowska shared how GovTech Polska was proactively engaging in conversations with start-ups and tech companies to help foster innovations. In order to stimulate innovations, it also organises open challenges where companies can apply and submit new ideas.

At GovTech Polska, we have no prerequisites, no formalities, only skills and ideas matter- says @JustOrlowska about the present and future of GovTech at @ImpactCEE with @ktmcnl (@CivTechScotland), @bfk (@GDSTeam), @RobynScott (@apoliticalco), @JoannaBekker (@PolitykaInsight) pic.twitter.com/b9J0PYjfiU

— Centrum GovTech (@GovTechPL) May 22, 2019

4. Listen to your citizens

This one is right up our alley. Change can’t just come from the top: in order to be relevant for citizens, innovation must also come from citizens. Governments should strive to invest citizens in decision-making and give them a voice.

Interestingly, two approaches were debated here. On the one hand, Breandán Knowlton from the UK’s Government Digital Services talked about the need for thorough user research and testing to make sure that innovation responded to real-world problems. On the other hand, Katy McNeil from CivTech Scotland mentioned citizen participation and giving citizens a voice.

In our mind, these approaches are complementary. User research can provide strong grounds to base projects on, but citizen participation allows empowerment and strengthens the democratic process.

5. Be ready to adapt your work processes

This was a useful reminder from Ott Velsberg, Estonia’s Chief Data Officer. Unless governments have the capacity to quickly respond to issues raised by citizens, digital participation projects aren’t fully living up to expectations. Citizen participation is forcing teams within administrations to co-operate more, be more flexible and react more quickly than they’re used to. These processes are not always easy, but they’re shaping the government of tomorrow.

More on this topic

  • What’s the difference between “civic tech” and “gov tech?”
  • The human factor: helping governments tap into collective intelligence
Coline Cuau
Written By
Coline Cuau

Head of Marketing during the day - Civic Tech enthusiast, data champion, and museum nerd during the night.

Platform
  • Engage
  • Manage
  • Decide
  • Get a demo
  • Start a free trial
  • Compare plans
Academy
  • Resources
  • Blog
Company
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Press
  • Partners
Get in touch
  • +44 79 2676 4670
  • +1 530 270 3403
  • +32 2 808 50 22
  • Contact form
Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2020 CitizenLab. All rights reserved.